tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7042465670825243265.post8662096658087325063..comments2024-01-24T00:53:51.521-08:00Comments on "Concerning sports...": My summary of OU's triumphant 2015 seasonAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12118334397603444029noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7042465670825243265.post-4696204528652357292015-12-03T23:27:27.180-08:002015-12-03T23:27:27.180-08:00The masses focused on the "lucky" part, ...The masses focused on the "lucky" part, especially the Baylor crowd. While you agreed with them, I disagree at least somewhat.<br /><br />Baylor ran Russell too much so his odds of injury were high. He averaged 7 rushes (this is from BillC's stats that censor "runs" from pass plays) over his first 7 games. Why are you running your QB vs Rice, SMU, Lamar, Tech, Iowa St, and Kansas?!?! <br /><br />His odds of injury were high, and OU got to Stidham anyway. OU relatively controlled line play on both sides. To say Russell would've tipped the scales in that game assumes too much.<br /><br />OU matches up poorly, relatively, vs Bama. I think only Ohio St would be well-suited to taking the Tide on again, but oh well. <br /><br />I've only watched snippets of Clemson outside of the ND game. The Big10 representative is inferior to the other three.quigleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07585516373077693748noreply@blogger.com